A Different Perspective

Let’s begin by acknowledging my viewpoint last weekend was incorrect. While my perspective was one where a Bear T was imminent, we actually had a strong rally to put that idea to rest last Monday. In fact, it has the potential at this point to lead to a Positive T until that same date, July 12. But it hasn’t fully developed yet.

While we have an extreme bottom with the move above the zero line on both the McOsci and the Volume Oscillator, we are missing the final confirmation of higher highs (prior to the move below their respective zero lines). Normally, we would expect an extreme move higher on these two indicators after such a strong rally early this week.

Last week, I emphasized the point that we had made a “Complex Structure” below the zero line, which created a bearish formation. Later that day, I emailed Tom McClellan regarding this structure, as in his weekly post he projected a bullish outcome with his article on the Summation Index crossing the neutral level. In response to my question, Tom indicated that while we did have that “Complex Structure”, it was “negated” by his view of the Summation Index cross.

After receiving his email, I advised those on elliiottwavetrader.net regarding his stance, with a link to the above-mentioned article. When we were at 6322 I posted a chart referencing this to be a line of support (noted in last week’s report) which dated back to last August, adding that Pension funds and insurance companies usually have to buy into the market on the last 2 days of the month, and withdraw amounts the next 2 days based on their institutional needs.

None of these acts detract from the fact that the premise of last week’s post was totally off base.

That being said, Price action has been very strong, without similar sharp strength being shown by the VO and McOsi as noted above–the last T-Theory clue will be a further move higher in the Volume Oscillator and McOsci. BPSPX also needs to cross back through the lower Keltner band and move above 50:

It’s interesting to note that in this week’s article on Tom McClellan’s site, he is also waiting for a move higher on the McClellan Oscillator to confirm the uptrend. As he puts it on his site,

The Oscillator can next give us additional confirmation of a bullish change by zooming up to a really high positive reading. Very low negative readings are usually conclusive in their nature. But a very high positive reading is a sign of strong initiation of an uptrend. We have not yet gotten that piece of confirmation. It will be something to look for in the days ahead.

Best to your trading.

8 thoughts on “A Different Perspective

  1. Do you see a magic t formed at march 2025 to october 2026 and we are in a smaller nested t now?

    thanks

    Like

    1. Sorry for the lack of posts lately. I believe we’re in the T lasting until July, as represented in my post.

      Like

      1. here is why i see we are in nested t within a larger magic t

        Center post (April 7, 2025 low): Extreme bottom where Volume Oscillator and McOsci crossed decisively above zero after left-side subnormal returns/weakness — the classic “all prior negatives discounted” signal of maximum internal strength. • Right-side superior returns: SPX has delivered sustained outperformance since that low, rallying to fresh all-time highs above 7,160 (April 24–26, 2026) — exactly the extended strength phase required by the Law of Matched Trend Time. • Nesting confirmation: The March 30–31, 2026 low (~6,400–6,530) was a normal rest period inside the larger T’s right side, spawning the smaller July 12, 2026 T we’re now running. This is textbook T-Theory behavior — smaller Ts forming during the strength leg of a bigger one. • No invalidation: Price has never broken the 2025-era supports, oscillators have maintained the recovery, and the April 2026 rally to new highs continues the superior-returns regime with no symmetry break.

        Like

      2. For you to create a center line on April 7, 2025, with the end of the T in October of 2026, you would need to begin the left side of your T roughly 550 days earlier–around early October 2023. You can’t create a T without an equal amount of cash buildup time. I’m not sure I see that. Can you help me with that?

        Like

      3. Based on the fact that the poster didn’t reply, I’ve come to the conclusion that the post was created using AI, without any understanding of T Theory.

        Like

  2. Hi Bunker. Thank you posts. Appreciated. If you wish to submit again your cat initiative-support collection link. Regards.

    Like

Comments are closed.